17

Nikolai Ladovsky with the students of his workshop at the VKhUTEIN architectural department, late 1920s

hile the Bauhaus remained a small, close-knit school, the staff and students at Vkhutemas were less of one mind. Avant-garde views flourished, especially amongst the school’s architecture faculty, as Ladovsky’s approach won more and more followers, achieving impressive results. Since architects must think spatially, Ladovsky advocated working on three-dimensional objects in actual space, not just on paper, and later rendering the detailed plans on blueprints.

 

This maquette method encouraged imagination and led to new approaches and the incorporation of unusual materials. This was the year, too, of an incident that threw light on the larger social-political context. During a visit from Lenin visited he inquired, “Perhaps there is even a Futurist among you?” only to be answered unhesitatingly: “Plenty.” Lenin left unhappy, apparently not enthused by the thought of artistic revolution. This was also the year of Wassily Kandinsky’s departure from the Soviet Union (never to return, it turned out). Although Kandinsky never taught at Vkhutemas he became a leading figure in INKhUK (the Institute of Art Culture), which worked closely with Vkhutemas.

Potrait of Wassily Kandinsky

18

Potrait of Wassily Kandinsky

Photo courtesy of Guggenheim Museum

 

Oskar Schlemmer, Triadic Ballet costumes, 1926

 

19

Wassily Kandinsky on the balcony of his Meisterhaus, Dessau, 1929

Photo by Nina Kandinsky, courtesy of Centre Pompidou/Bibliothèque Kandinsky, Paris

ropius then introduced a requirement for everything produced in the studios: the quantity of parts must be kept to a minimum. The idea was to ready the process for mass production. The principles of what would eventually be known as “Bauhaus style” were now in place. Soon after a new master joined the faculty, Wassily Kandinsky, invited by Gropius following a long correspondence. Kandinsky’s specialty was classes in form and color.

 

In the theater department Oskar Schlemmer staged the Triadisches Ballett, the defining composition of his tenure. The ballet was designed in three parts (3 dancers, 12 dances in all), ascending from burlesque and comedy to the ceremonial and grand, peaking finally in fantasy.

 

Oskar Schlemmer, Triadic Ballet costumes

21

Oskar Schlemmer, Triadic Ballet costumes, 1926

Schlemmer proceeded by creating costumes suggestive of his paintings, then selecting music and mapping the movements of the dancers. Schlemmer offered something entirely innovative within the history of the theater.

Oskar Schlemmer, Figure plan for the triadic ballet

22

Oskar Schlemmer, Figure plan for the triadic ballet, 1926

23

Vkhutemas instructor and pioneering architectural constructivist Aleksandr Vesnin, 1922

 

plan was laid to launch an industrial design studio, led by some of the leading figures in Soviet design: Aleksandr Vesnin, Liubov Popova, Aleksandr Rodchenko, Anton Lavinsky. All were overt constructivists. This became one of the central episodes of the movement in helping shape its ideas and execution.

Liubov Popova and Alexander Vesnin with students at VkHUTEMAS

25

Liubov Popova and Alexander Vesnin with students at VkHUTEMAS, 1922

 

 

The studio came to serve as a base of experimentation, testing methods and pursuing new activities within the aesthetic. Gradually it formalized into an official Vkhutemas department where students trained and worked for two years designing household items, advertisements, print materials, and public demonstrations. Later the school tried to steer a more neutral course among the competing artistic factions, installing Vladimir Favorsky as the new director, and shutting down this department.

Lyubov Popova’s mechanical set for The Magnanimous Cuckold

27

Lyubov Popova’s mechanical set for The Magnanimous Cuckold, 1922

Photo courtesy of V&A Museum

Varvara Stepanova's designs for the performance of An Evening of the Book

Photo by Aleksandr Rodchenko

 

28

Haus Am Horn

Photo by Georg Muche

he Weimar government requested a public exhibition be organized to demonstrate the school's accomplishments, to be prepared by Gropius. The crowning glory of this endeavor was a single-family home, Haus Am Horn, designed by Adolf Meyer from drawings by George Muche. It’s the only building that could fully be considered “a child of the Bauhaus,” as it was meant to serve as a prototype for whole settlements of such dwellings.

 

Kitchen, Haus am Horn

30

Kitchen, Haus am Horn, 1923

© Staatliche Bildstelle Berlin

Haus am Horn

31

Haus am Horn

Photo by Werner Huthmacher

 

Meanwhile, Itten’s mysticism became too much for Gropius, who dismissed him in favor of Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, whose arrival signified a new, largely Constructivist era for the Bauhaus, featuring innovations in type design, graphics and book publishing, as well as experiments in video and photography. A Hungarian by birth, Nad had been deeply affected by an exhibition of Russian avant-garde art in Budapest and very impressed by the ideas of Tatlin, Rodchenko, Malevich, Lissitsky, and Popova.

"Staatliches Bauhaus in Weimar 1919–1923” Book

33

"Staatliches Bauhaus in Weimar 1919–1923” Book

© MET, New York

Gropius slogan:

“Art and technology—the new unity”