ropius worked with De Stijl, the Dutch creative group that includes Piet Mondrian, Theo van Doesburg, and
J. J. P. Oud, and the Bauhaus became strongly involved with ideas of neoplasticism, De Stijl’s theory of the equality of opposites: verticals and horizontals, vacancies and masses, black and white, seen as representing the opposition of natural forces.

13
16
14
Portrait of Lothar Schreyer, 1922
© Bauhaus Archiv Berlin
Piet Mondrian, Composition, 1929
© Mondrian/Holtzman Trust
Bauhaus Building Blocks designed by Alma Siedhoff-Buscher in 1923
Photo courtesy of Naef


17

Nikolai Ladovsky with the students of his workshop at the VKhUTEIN architectural department, late 1920s
hile the Bauhaus remained a small, close-knit school, the staff and students at Vkhutemas were less of one mind. Avant-garde views flourished, especially amongst the school’s architecture faculty, as Ladovsky’s approach won more and more followers, achieving impressive results. Since architects must think spatially, Ladovsky advocated working on three-dimensional objects in actual space, not just on paper, and later rendering the detailed plans on blueprints.
This maquette method encouraged imagination and led to new approaches and the incorporation of unusual materials. This was the year, too, of an incident that threw light on the larger social-political context. During a visit from Lenin visited he inquired, “Perhaps there is even a Futurist among you?” only to be answered unhesitatingly: “Plenty.” Lenin left unhappy, apparently not enthused by the thought of artistic revolution. This was also the year of Wassily Kandinsky’s departure from the Soviet Union (never to return, it turned out). Although Kandinsky never taught at Vkhutemas he became a leading figure in INKhUK (the Institute of Art Culture), which worked closely with Vkhutemas.

Oskar Schlemmer, Triadic Ballet costumes, 1926