the consequences of a bad logo

Wilhelm Deffke was one of the first designers who publicly reflected on the consequences of a bad logotype and its ability to harm a company’s reputation. He went as far as discussing proprietary rights and legal protection of a logo, subjects that became a part of the mainstream design rhetoric only much later.

A drawing of a kiosk with Reemtsma logo. Illustration for Reemtsma
A letter B with a wing. A signet

Kiosk illustration for Reemtsma, Erfurt, 1920–21.

Work for Hansa und Brandenburgische.

Logo for Hansa und Brandenburgische. A red bird's head turned sideways with letters H and B
Draft design for Reemtsma delivery car. A drawing of a car with Reemtsma logo

Draft design for Reemtsma delivery car, 1920.

Created with Sketch.

trademarks deserve our attention as a means of improving the public taste, and because of their extraordinary economic significance, their value is in the millions. —wilhelm deffke

Logo for Altona A.D. A crossover between a human face and a caterpillar

Logo for Altona A.D. Elbe.

reductionism

Some of the classic Deffke’s logos, such as J.A. Henckels’ zwilling (“twins”), are still in use. Their aesthetic vitality is driven by how the designer was working: he always picked a basic geometric shape or a primitive symbol and refined its proportions to shed weight off of a mark and get rid of all unnecessities.

Logo for J.A. Henckels. Twin brothers
Logo for Argus. An eye

Logo for J.A. Henckels.

Logo for Argus.

Redesign of Peter Behrens' original 1908 AEG logo. Honeycombs with letters A, E, G inside
Redesign of the logo for Siemens & Halske AG. Letters S and H, combined
Redesign of the Dreiring, trademark for the Friedrich Krupp AG. Three connected rings
Frisch Fromm Froh Frel logo. Four connected letters F

Redesign of the Dreiring, trademark for the cast steel works, Friedrich Krupp AG, 1917.

Redesign of the logo for Siemens & Halske AG, 1917.

Frisch Fromm Froh Frel.

Redesign of Peter Behrens' original 1908 AEG logo, 1917.

Created with Sketch.

it is not sufficient to use trademarks once in a while to designate certain products. they must be used systematically and frequently. —wilhelm deffke

Whale signet

Whale signet, 1930–45.

discovering hakenkreuz

Deffke’s version of the ancient Hakenkreuz (“hooked cross”) first appeared in Wilhelmwerk’s trademark brochure ‘Handelsmarken und Fabrikzeihen’ (1917): a clean-cut take on the powerful mark that over the centuries surfaced in many different cultures and contexts.

According to Deffke’s former assistant Mana Tress, the proportions of the Nazi swastika were inspired, or possibly even copied from the designer’s brochure, with minor alterations. But unlike a handful of modernized marks for the German military and propaganda materials commissioned by the Weimar Republic, that one Deffke didn’t create on a government assignment.

Black Hakenkreuz on a white background
German Reich coat of arms. Black bird on a white background

Hakenkreuz, 1917.

German Reich coat of arms.

Created with Sketch.

if a trademark is created by competent hands, it will gain in importance, as it, in conjunction with other advertising means, reappears in ads in newspapers and magazines, business papers and brochures, on factory walls, vans and trucks. —wilhelm deffke

Eisenhand. Black iron glove on a white background

Eisenhand, 1920.